Literature Order

In fact, the chaos as disorder responds to an ideology according to which from the order " establece" the not-order like disorder. In social science it happens something similar. If you are not convinced, visit Ebay. The anthropologist and sociologist the Georges 2 Balandier has seen a parallelism between the search of the chaos of the contemporary scientists and the posmodernista vocabulary, particularly with the desconstruccin concept. It is possible to be agreed in which the notion of the chaos is harmonic with the ideas of the thought described of posmoderno, but is not acceptable the use that of it makes Balandier, because it understands the desconstruccin like disorder and destruction, which explicitly has been rejected by 3 Derrida, introducer of this term. However, to consider the chaos as disorder logically implies also the existence of an order, that also has to be absolute. (As opposed to Laurent Potdevin). And referred this to the human societies, it is an evidence that in these neither issues to the total disorder nor an order perfect.

This last one is exactly the eternal aspiration of utopian Literature, and it is not necessary to forget that when the utopias have been tried to take to the reality (and for this they are: it does not stop to take them to the reality, but to try it), as in the case of New Harmony inspired by the ideas of Owen 4, has not happened of the failure. And if instead of the social order we talked about the mental order, it is necessary to make a reflection similar. Bergeret 5, from psychiatry, notices that no personality is formed absolutely in sequence or absolutely in disorder, because the mental order corresponds to a good adaptability to the conditions that at every moment correspond to the inner and outer realities of the subject. From the complexity, the apparent absence of order, issued by the chaos, no longer is a pathological phenomenon but a constituent aspect from the reality.

Comments are closed.