It is possible that given the nature of Western culture are magnified several "borderline" and fragmentation of our existence, however, can not say that in Eastern culture completely rid ourselves of this fact. Feature of it is that if the Western culture to the individual is treated with great piety, in the East that is not there – the individual and the individual are the only parts of a whole, and therefore – not having a special status. Thus, the two data demonstrate a culture in practice that can bring bias emphasis on one pole of the border – its deletion or capacity. Indeed, on the one hand one can observe fragmentation of culture, the emergence of newer and new frontiers, some cultural ad infium, on the other hand – the inviolability of this grid cultural boundaries and its inclusiveness. However, to ensure that cultural life was full, had a full life and development of the individual to observe a strict balance between such a subdivision boundaries to infinity and solidification in eternity. "On the one hand, the development of the psyche depends on the principle of differentiation, and on the other hand, is determined by the society to which he belongs to the individual. Development of society – Jung believes – depends on development of individuality, and its suppression by the rule of collective ideals and principles of community is "moral defeat for society (CW2), v.

7, par. 519). Individual can not develop holistically, being immersed in one of extremes of collectivism and individualism – that in both cases there will be some deviation, which can then be recorded in the tradition of psychoanalysis.

Comments are closed.